01//DefinitionTerm

// ##is-def =Interactivity-induced Salience — the visual prominence an element gains specifically because the user interacted with it . Contrast: Static Salience (Bold text, Headlines) determined by the author . Here, the *user* decides what is important through action

---

02//VisualPerception

// ##is-vis → Pre-Interaction: A line of text is part of the "uniform texture" → Interaction: User clicks or tags → Post-Interaction: The line changes color/opacity ! Result: It "pops" out from the background noise during future scanning

---

03//In CLNMechanism

// ##is-cln * CLN relies on Episodic Overlay to render this salience . The "Gold" or "Cyan" highlights are not just decoration . They are visual markers of an Event Boundary

▽Uniform Text Field (Low Salience)

+User Click (Interaction)

◇Highlighted Node (High Salience)

---

04//EffectOutcome

// ##is-eff + Reduces scan time during review (eyes jump to colors) + Creates a visual hierarchy that reflects *personal* history, not authorial intent // ##is-open ? Does too much salience (too many highlights) lead to "visual noise" and reduce the effect?